dashboard.audreyinc.com — proposal sketch
Date: 2026-05-13 Reuses pattern from: dare-pipeline GHA migration, the dare dashboard’s narrator-+-analytics-+-render-+-deploy shape Status: Proposal. Not built. Phase 0–1 ready to start when greenlit.
TL;DR
audreyinc.com is doing 30k requests/day and the questions you’re actually asking — why are people landing, what do they look at, and where does the funnel leak before purchase — are unanswered by any current surface. The dare dashboard pattern transfers cleanly, with one architectural twist: two canonical sources need to coexist in the brief. Cloudflare Analytics owns top-of-funnel (traffic, geo, referrers); Shopify Admin GraphQL owns bottom-of-funnel (orders, AOV, conversion). The dashboard’s job is to make those two sources tell one story.
Same plumbing as dare-pipeline (GHA cron → brief → Haiku narrator → static HTML → CDN, security layer, and DNS provider sitting in front of dare.co.uk.">CF Pages), same Code Shared credentials, same dev-report lineage. Realistic build: Phase 0–1 (read-only MVP with both sources) in ~3 hours; full conversion-funnel narrative in ~6. Recurring cost: ~$0 (Haiku narrator at ~$0.40/year, everything else free-tier).
Why this earns the build now
Three signals make this load-bearing rather than indulgent:
- 30k/day is real traffic. That’s 3× dare’s baseline. At that volume, “I wonder what’s happening” stops being intellectual curiosity and starts being decisions you should be able to make daily — which products to feature, which markets to lean into, which referrers to nurture.
- Commerce questions are different from editorial questions. dare’s dashboard answers “is the archive holding up?” — that’s a status question. audrey’s needs to answer “is the funnel working?” — that’s a decision question. Decision-grade analytics needs both halves: top-of-funnel + conversion.
- The pattern is proved and cheap to copy. dare-pipeline ships at $0/mo with a Haiku narrator that costs cents. Once the audrey version exists, dogwood is one more copy away. The portfolio-multiplier is real.